|
Making the Best Out of Youth Sports: 13 Steps to Being a
Winning Parent INTRODUCTION
If you want your child to come out of his youth sports experience a winner (feeling good about himself and having
a healthy attitude towards sports), then he needs your help! You are a vital and important part of the coach-athlete-parent
team. If you do your job correctly and play your position well, then your child will learn the sport faster, perform better,
really have fun and have his self-esteem enhanced as a result. His sport experience will serve as a positive model for him
to follow as he approaches other challenges and obstacles throughout life. If you "drop the ball" or run the wrong
way with it, your child will stop learning, experience performance difficulties and blocks, and begin to really hate the sport.
And that's the good news! Further, your relationship with him will probably suffer significantly. As a result, he will
come out of this experience burdened with feelings of failure, inadequacy and low self-esteem, feelings that will generalize
to other areas in his life. Your child and his coach need you on the team. They can't win without you! The following are
a list of useful facts, guidelines and strategies for you to use to make you more skilled in the youth sport game. Remember,
no wins unless everyone wins. We need you on the team!
STEP ONE 
When defined the right way, competition in youth sports is both good and healthy and teaches children a variety
of important life skills. The word "compete" comes from the Latin words "com" and "petere" which
mean together and seeking respectively. The true definition of competition is a seeking together where your opponent is your
partner, not the enemy! The better he performs, the more chance you have of having a peak performance. Sports is about learning
to deal with challenges and obstacles. Without a worthy opponent, without any challenges sports is not so much fun. The more
the challenge the better the opportunity you have to go beyond your limits. World records are consistently broken and set
at the Olympics because the best athletes in the world are "seeking together", challenging each other to enhanced
performance. Your child should never be taught to view his opponent as the "bad guy", the enemy or someone to be
hated and "destroyed". Do not model this attitude! Instead, talk to/make friends with parents of your child's
opponent. Root for great performances, good plays, not just for the winner!
STEP
TWO
ENCOURAGE YOUR CHILD TO COMPETE AGAINST HIMSELF The ultimate goal of the sport experience is to challenge
oneself and continually improve. Unfortunately, judging improvement by winning and losing is both an unfair and inaccurate
measure. Winning in sports is about doing the best you can do, seperate from the outcome or the play of your opponent. Children
should be encouraged to compete against their own potential (i.e., Peter and Patty Potential). That is, the boys should focus
on beating "Peter", competing against themselves, while the girls challenge "Patty". When your child has
this focus and plays to better himself instead of beating someone else, he will be more relaxed, have more fun and therefore
perform better.
STEP THREE
DO NOT DEFINE SUCCESS
AND FAILURE IN TERMS OF WINNING AND LOSING A corollary to TWO, one of the main purposes of the youth sports experience is
skill acquisition and mastery. When a child performs to his potential and loses it is criminal to focus on the outcome and
become critical. If a child plays his very best and loses, you need to help him feel like a winner! Similarly, when a child
or team performs far below their potential but wins, this is not cause to feel like a winner. Help your child make this important
separation between success and failure and winning and losing. Remember, if you define success and failure in terms of winning
and losing, you're playing a losing game with your child!
STEP
FOUR
BE SUPPORTIVE, DO NOT COACH! Your role on the
parent-coach-athlete team is as a Support player with a capital S! You need to be your child's best fan. unconditionally!
Leave the coaching and instruction to the coach. Provide encouragement, support, empathy, transportation, money, help with
fund-raisers, etc., but... do not coach! Most parents that get into trouble with their children do so because they forget
to remember the important position that they play. Coaching interferes with your role as supporter and fan. The last thing
your child needs and wants to hear from you after a disappointing performance or loss is what they did technically or strategically
wrong. Keep your role as a parent on the team separate from that as coach, and, if by necessity you actually get stuck in
the almost no-win position of having to coach your child, try to maintain this separation of roles (i.e. on the deck, field
or court say, "Now I'm talking to you as a coach", at home say, "Now I'm talking to you as a parent").
Don't parent when you coach and don't coach at home when you're supposed to be parenting.
STEP FIVE
HELP MAKE THE SPORT FUN FOR YOUR CHILD It's a time proven principle of peak performance that the more fun an athlete is having, the more they
will learn and the better they will perform. Fun must be present for peak performance to happen at every level of sports from
youth to world class competitor! When a child stops having fun and begins to dread practice or competition, it's time
for you as a parent to become concerned! When the sport or game becomes too serious, athletes have a tendency to burn out
and become susceptible to repetitive performance problems. An easy rule of thumb: If your child is not enjoying what they
are doing, nor loving the heck out of it, investigate! What is going on that's preventing them from having fun? Is it
the coaching? The pressure? Is it you?! Keep in mind that being in a highly competitive program does not mean that there is
no room for fun. The child that continues to play long after the fun is going will soon become a drop out statistic.
STEP SIX
WHOSE GOAL IS IT? FIVE leads us to a very important question! Why is your child participating in the sport? Are they doing
it because they want to, for them, or because of you. When they have problems in their sport do you talk about them as "our"
problems, "our jump isn't high enough", "we're having trouble with our flip turn" , etc. Are they
playing because they don't want to disappoint you, because they know how important the sport is to you? Are they playing
for rewards and "bonuses" that you give out? Are their goals and aspirations yours or theirs? How invested are you
in their success and failure? If they are competing to please you or for your vicarious glory they are in it for the wrong
reasons! Further, if they stay involved for you, ultimately everyone will lose. It is quite normal and healthy to want your
child to excel and be as successful as possible. But, you cannot make this happen by pressuring them with your expectations
or by using guilt or bribery to keep them involved. If they have their own reasons and own goals for participating, they will
be far more motivated to excel and therefore far more successful.
STEP
SEVEN
YOUR CHILD IS NOT HIS PERFORMANCE-LOVE HIM UNCONDITIONALLY Do
not equate your child's self-worth and lovability with his performance. The most tragic and damaging mistake I see parents
continually make is punishing a child for a bad performance by withdrawing emotionally from him. A child loses a race, strikes
out or misses and easy shot on goal and the parent responds with disgust, anger and withdrawal of love and approval. CAUTION:
Only use this strategy if you want to damage your child emotionally and ruin your relationship with him. In the 1988 Olympics,
when Greg Louganis needed and got a perfect 10 on his last dive to overtake the Chinese diver for the gold medal, his last
thought before he went was, "If I don't make it, my mother will still love me".
STEP EIGHT
REMEMBER THE IMPORTANCE OF SELF-ESTEEM IN ALL OF YOUR INTERACTIONS WITH YOUR
CHILD-ATHLETE Athletes of all ages and levels perform in direct relationship to how they feel about themselves. When
your child is in an athletic environment that boosts his self-esteem, he will learn faster, enjoy himself more and perform
better under competitive pressure. One thing we all want as children and never stop wanting is to be loved and accepted, and
to have our parents feel good about what we do. This is how self-esteem gets established. When your interactions with your
child make him feel good about himself, he will, in turn, learn to treat himself this very same way. This does not mean that
you have to incongruently compliment your child for a great effort after they have just performed miserably. In this situation
being empathic and sensitive to his feelings is what's called for. Self esteem makes the world go round. Make your child
feel good about himself and you've given him a gift that lasts a lifetime. Do not interact with your child in a way that
assaults his self-esteem by degrading, embarrassing or humiliating him. If you continually put your child down or minimize
his accomplishments not only will he learn to do this to himself throughout his life, but he will also repeat your mistake
with his children!
STEP NINE
GIVE YOUR CHILD
THE GIFT OF FAILURE If you really want your child to be as happy
and as successful as possible in everything that he does, teach him how to fail! The most successful people in and out of
sports do two things differently than everyone else. First,, they are more willing to take risks and therefore fail more frequently.
Second, they use their failures in a positive way as a source of motivation and feedback to improve. Our society is generally
negative and teaches us that failure is bad, a cause for humiliation and embarrassment, and something to be avoided at all
costs. Fear of failure or humiliation causes one to be tentative and non-active. In fact, most performance blocks and poor
performances are a direct result of the athlete being preoccupied with failing or messing up. You can't learn to walk
without falling enough times. Each time that you fall your body gets valuable information on how to do it better. You can't
be successful or have peak performances if you are concerned with losing or failing. Teach your child how to view setbacks,
mistakes and risk-taking positively and you'll have given him the key to a lifetime of success. Failure is the perfect
stepping stone to success.
STEP TEN
CHALLENGE,
DON'T THREATEN Many parents directly or indirectly use guilt
and threats as a way to "motivate" their child to perform better. Performance studies clearly indicate that while
threats may provide short term results, the long term costs in terms of psychological health and performance are devastating.
Using fear as a motivator is probably one of the worst dynamics you could set up with your child. Threats take the fun out
of performance and directly lead to your child performing terribly. implicit in a threat, (do this or else!) is your own anxiety
that you do not believe the child is capable. Communicating this lack of belief, even indirectly is further devastating to
the child's performance. A challenge does not entail loss or negative consequences should the athlete fail. Further, implicit
in a challenge is the empowering belief, "I think that you can do it".
STEP ELEVEN
STRESS PROCESS, NOT OUTCOME When
athletes choke under pressure and perform far below their potential, a very common cause of this is a focus on the outcome
of the performance (i.e., win/lose, instead of the process). In any peak performance, the athlete is totally oblivious to
the outcome and instead is completely absorbed in the here and now of the actual performance. An outcome focus will almost
always distract and tighten up the athlete insuring a bad performance. Furthermore focusing on the outcome, which is completely
out of the athlete's control will raise his anxiety to a performance inhibiting level. So if you truly want your child
to win, help get his focus away from how important the contest is and have them focus on the task at hand. Supportive parents
de-emphasize winning and instead stress learning the skills and playing the game.
STEP TWELVE
AVOID COMPARISONS AND RESPECT DEVELOPMENTAL DIFFERENCES Supportive parents
do not use other athletes that their child competes against to compare and thus evaluate their child's progress. Comparisons
are useless, inaccurate and destructive. Each child matures differently and the process of comparison ignores significant
distorting effects of developmental differences. For example, two 12 year old boys may only have their age in common! One
may physically have the build and perform like a 16 year old while the other, a late developer, may have the physical size
and attribute of a 9 year old. Performance comparisons can prematurely turn off otherwise talented athletes on their sport.
The only value of comparisons is in teaching. If one child demonstrates proper technique, that child can be used comparatively
as a model only! For your child to do his very best he needs to learn to stay within himself. Worrying about how another athlete
is doing interferes with him doing this.
STEP THIRTEEN
TEACH YOUR CHILD TO HAVE A PERSPECTIVE ON THE SPORTS EXPERIENCE The sports media in this country would like you to
believe that sports and winning/losing is larger than life. The fact that it is just a game frequently gets lost in translation.
This lack of perspective frequently trickles down to the youth sport level and young athletes often come away from competition
with a distorted view of themselves and how they performed. Parents need to help their children develop realistic expectations
about themselves, their abilities and how they played, without robbing the child of his dreams. Swimming a lifetime best time
and coming in dead last is a cause for celebration, not depression. Similarly, losing the conference championships does not
mean that the sun will not rise tomorrow.
On-base percentage In baseball statistics, on-base percentage (OBP) (sometimes referred
to as on-base average [OBA], as the statistic is rarely presented as a true percentage) is a measure of how
often a batter reaches base for any reason other than a fielding error, fielder's choice, dropped/uncaught third strike,
fielder's obstruction, or catcher's interference (the latter two are ignored as either times-on-base (TOB) or plate
appearances in calculating OBP). OBP is added to slugging average to determine on-base plus slugging (OPS). It first became
an official MLB statistic in 1984. Traditionally, the best leadoff
hitters in the game have high on-base percentages. The league average for on-base percentage has varied considerably over
time; in the modern era it is around .340, whereas it was typically only .300 in the dead-ball era. On-base percentage can
also vary quite considerably from player to player. The record for the highest career OBP by a hitter, based on over 3000
plate appearances, is .482 by Ted Williams. The lowest is by Bill Bergen, who had an OBP of .194. Though extremely unlikely, it is possible for a player's on-base percentage to be lower
than his batting average (H/AB). However very few players in major league history fall into this category, with the majority
of them having under 100 ABs, as it requires having almost no walks or times hit by pitch, with a relatively higher number
of sacrifice flies (e.g. if a player has 2 hits in 6 at bats with a sacrifice fly, his batting average would be .333, but
his on-base percentage would be .286). An example of this phenomenon would be the Hall-of-Fame pitcher Phil Niekro's hitting
statistics from 1982. In 87 AB he never walked, but had four sacrifice hits, leading to a Batting Average of .195 and an OBP
of .193. On-base percentage is calculated using this formula: - OBP= H + BB + HBP
- AB + BB + HBP + SF
- where
- H = Hits
- BB
= Bases on Balls (Walks)
- HBP = times Hit By a
Pitch
- AB = At bats
- SF = Sacrifice Flies
NOTE:
Sacrifice flies were not counted as an official statistic until 1954. Before that time, all sacrifices were counted as sacrifice
hits (SH), which included both sacrifice flies and bunts. Bunts (sacrifice hits since 1954), which would lower a batter's
on-base percentage, are not included in the calculation for on-base percentage, as bunting is an offensive strategy –
often dictated by the manager – the use of which does not necessarily reflect on the batter's ability and should
not be used to penalize him. For calculations of OBP before 1954, or where sacrifice flies are not explicitly listed, the
number of sacrifice flies should be assumed to be zero.

Slugging Percentage first season
for the New York Yankees. In 458 at bats, Ruth had 172 hits, comprising 73 singles, 36 doubles, 9 triples, and 54 home runs,
which brings the total base count to 73 + (36 × 2) + (9 × 3) + (54 × 4) = 388. His total number of bases
(388) divided by his total at-bats (458) is .847, his slugging percentage for the season. The next year he slu In baseball statistics, slugging percentage (abbreviated SLG) is
a popular measure of the power of a hitter. It is calculated as total bases divided by at bats: SLG= (1B) + (2 x 2B) + (3 x 3B + (4 x HR)
AB where AB is the number
of at-bats for a given player, and 1B, 2B, 3B, and HR are the number of singles, doubles,
triples, and home runs, respectively. Walks are specifically excluded from this calculation. For
example, in 1920, Babe Ruth played his gged .846, and these records went unbroken until 2001, when Barry Bonds achieved 411
bases in 476 at-bats, bringing his slugging percentage to .863, unmatched since. In
baseball statistics, slugging percentage (abbreviated SLG) is a popular measure of the power
of a hitter. It is calculated as total bases divided by at bats: SLG=
(1B) + (2 x 2B) + (3 x 3B + (4 x HR)
AB where AB is the number
of at-bats for a given player, and 1B, 2B, 3B, and HR are the number of singles, doubles,
triples, and home runs, respectively. Walks are specifically excluded from this calculation. Long after it was first invented, slugging percentage gained new significance when baseball analysts realized
that it combined with on-base percentage (OBP) to form a very good measure of a player's overall offensive production
(in fact, OBP + SLG was originally referred to as "production" by baseball writer and statistician Bill James).
A predecessor metric was developed by Branch Rickey in 1954. Rickey, in Life Magazine, suggested that combining OBP
with what he called "extra base power" (EBP) would give a better indicator of player performance than typical Triple
Crown stats. EBP was a predecessor to slugging percentage.[1] Allen Barra and George Ignatin were early adopters in combining the two modern-day statistics, multiplying
them together to form what is now known as "SLOB" (Slugging × On-Base).[2] Bill
James applied this principle to his runs created formula several years later (and perhaps independently), essentially multiplying
SLOB × At-Bats to create the formula
Earned run averageIn baseball statistics, earned run average (ERA)
is the mean of earned runs given up by a pitcher per nine innings pitched. The ERA tells the average number of runs a pitcher
would surrender over the course of a full game had he been kept in for the full nine innings. It is determined by dividing
the number of earned runs allowed by the number of innings pitched and multiplying by nine. Unearned runs, resulting from
batters reaching base on errors (even errors by pitchers) do not count toward ERA if they later score. To a pitcher, a lower
earned run average is preferable to a higher one. ERA= Total game innings x (Earned runs given up/Innings pitched)
As with batting
average, the threshold of a good ERA varies from year to year. In the 1910s, a good ERA was below 2.00 (two earned runs allowed
per nine innings). In the late 1920s and 1930s, when conditions of the game changed in a way that strongly favored hitters,
a good ERA was below 4.00; only a pitcher of the caliber of Dazzy Vance or Lefty Grove would consistently post an ERA under
3.00 during those years. In the 1960s, sub-2.00 ERAs returned as ballparks with different dimensions were introduced, among
other influences. Today, an ERA under 4.00 is again considered very good, although pitchers such as Greg Maddux and Pedro
Martínez stand out as Grove and Vance did in their day. The all-time single-season
record for lowest ERA in a season is 0.86, set by Tim Keefe in 1880. The modern record is 0.96, set by Dutch Leonard in 1914.
The lowest single-season ERA of a pitcher since 1950 is 1.12, achieved by Bob Gibson in 1968. The career record is 1.82, held
by Ed Walsh, and the active player with the lowest career ERA (among those with more than 1,000 innings pitched) is Mariano
Rivera, with an ERA of 2.30 through the 2008 season. Rivera, though he is a relief pitcher, has more than 1,000 lifetime innings
pitched, earning the right, in many fans' minds, to be considered on an equal footing with starters in debates involving
the term "greatest pitcher". Some sources may list players with undefined
or infinite career ERAs. This can happen if a pitcher allows one or more earned runs without retiring a batter (usually in
a single appearance). An undefined ERA occasionally occurs at the beginning of a baseball season. It is sometimes incorrectly
displayed as zero or as the lowest ranking ERA when it is more akin to the highest. In
modern baseball, ERAs can be interpreted in the following way: | ERA | Meaning |
|---|
| <2.00 | Considered exceptional and is rare. | | 2.00 to 3.00 | Excellent, only achieved by best pitchers
in the league. | | 3.00 to 4.00 | Better
than average. | | 4.00 to 5.00 | Average. | | 5.00 to 6.00 | Worse than average. | | >6.00 | Consistently having an ERA this high risks
demotion to the bullpen, or a lower league. |
|